Police Slash Tent City
Monday, January 22, 2007
Tuesday, January 16, 2007
Who Killed John O'Neill? (911, conspiracy, ONeill, Loose Change)
| If you believe the media, John P. O'Neill was simply another innocent victim killed in the September 11 attacks on the World Trade Center. But you don't need much imagination to suspect something deeper was at work. Clearly, O'Neill was a man Osama bin Laden wanted dead. O'Neill had been a Deputy Director of the FBI, and Osama bin Laden's main pursuer in the US government. O'Neill had investigated the bombings of the World Trade Center in 1993, a US base in Saudi Arabia in 1996, the US embassies in Nairobi and Dar-Es-Salaam in 1998, and the USS Cole last year. But once the first plane hit the North Tower, Osama bin Laden wouldn't be the only man to profit from O'Neill's death. At the moment of impact, O'Neill became the man who knew too much. Just two weeks, TWO WEEKS, prior to the attack, O'Neill had left his job with the FBI. O'Neill had quit because he believed that the Bush administration had stymied the intelligence agency's investigations on terrorism. O'Neill charged that it had done so even as it bargained with the Taliban on handing over of Osama bin Laden in exchange for political recognition and economic aid. In the ultimate irony, O'Neill had gone public with these charges at the same time that he was leaving the FBI to become the head of security at the World Trade Center. Creative Commons License (by-nc-sa) http://www.WKJO.com | |
Enron & The California "Rolling Blackouts" Conspiracy
| This is for the people who think that conspiracies don't happen. This is for the people who think that otherwise normal people couldn't do something wildly evil for money, and actually enjoy doing it. Very conveniently, almost all of the SEC case files related to Enron's fraudulent activities were lost forever when World Trade Center Building 7 "fainted in sympathy" with its bigger brothers into a pile of rubble on 9/11. This couldn't have anything to do with the fact that Enron was the single largest corporate contributor to the 2000 presidential campaign of George W. Bush, could it? | |
INDICATIONS THE HURRICANE KATRINA DISASTER WAS PURPOSELY ALLOWED TO HAPPEN
| hurricane, katrina, new, orleans, conspiracy, martial law, gun, confiscation, search, warrant, | |
Prisoners of Katrina
| In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, while thousands fled New Orleans, the city's prisoners were trapped. Fresh eye-witness accounts reveal what really happened to those left behind, and how crucial forensic evidence was simply washed away. | |
911 Mysteries - Demolitions (Full)
| 911 Mysteries demolishes the official 911 conspiracy theory more graphically than any movie previously released. See for yourself what really happened in the 3 demolished buildings in the weeks before 9/11. The American public has shown a "remarkable indifference to being deceived" (George Soros), threatening open society worldwide. But this is changing. As Hugo Chavez put it: "The world is waking up. It's waking up all over. And people are standing up." Millions of people around the world are realizing that they are being lied to by their governments - not in a small, lazy way, but in a big way. It's time to ask hard questions, many of which 911 Mysteries helps to answer. 90 minutes of pure demolition evidence and analysis, laced with staggering witness testimonials. Careful deconstruction of the official story set alongside clear science. The question is not one of politics or nationalism or loyalty, but one of strict and simple physics. Does steel melt in open air fires? What caused the core to vanish? How do you get a 10-second 110-story pancake collapse? A movie that might actually reach our complacent mainstream. No agenda. No finger-pointing. Just the facts and the mysteries. Look at that. Think about this. A story of people: Willie Rodriguez's strange recollection of noises on the 34th floor. Who was up there, bumping around? Scott Forbes' similar story, weeks before the towers fell. Here's how shaped charges slice through steel beams to control the way they fall. For greater clarity, download the movie here instead of watching online - or buy a DVD online at http://www.911mysteries.com. Finally, watch out - make sure you don't miss the ending - minutes 1:26-1:30. Absolutely the best part. Wake up, and you will make the difference. 911 is a Keyhole into Consciousness. If you make it through to the other side, everything looks different. Do Not Be Afraid. This is the First Awakening. Follow your curiosity, like Alice in the rabbit hole. You are becoming free. Key Words: World Trade Center, WTC, WTC7, NIST, FEMA, Twin Towers, Controlled Demolition, Thermate, Thermite, Explosions, 9/11, 911, 9-11, September 11th, Conspiracy Theories, George Bush, Dick Cheney, Rumsfeld, NORAD, FAA, FBI, CIA, NSA, Larry Silverstein, William Rodriguez, Steven Jones, Loose Change, Alex Jones. | |
Pretext For The North America Union (NAU): Part 4 Policy Makers (CFR)
| This presentation is an important, detailed and timely look at forming of the North America Union (NAU). This information is most helpful as a primer to those who know little about the NAU or the CFR. This includes Part 4: Policy Makers and Part 5: Get Involved. | |
Pretext For The North America Union (NAU): Part 3 The Media (Amero, TTC & I.D.)
| This presentation is an important, detailed and timely look at forming of the North America Union (NAU). This information is most helpful as a primer to those who know little about the NAU or the CFR. This includes Part 3: The Media and discussions about the NAU, the Amero, the Texas Trans Cooridor (TTC) and the New National I.D. (Real I.D. Act). | |
Friday, January 12, 2007
Pretext For The North America Union (NAU 1): The Foundation SPP (Segment 1)
| This presentation is an important, detailed and timely look at forming of the North America Union (NAU). This is information is most helpful to those who knows little about the NAU or the CFR. This complete presentation is broken into three segments - this is segment 1. For a FREE DVD of this presentation e-mail: no_northamericaunion@yahoo.com. | |
Wednesday, January 10, 2007
Bangor Maine:Makes It Illegal to Smoke in Cars
Associated Press
Tuesday, January 9, 2007
The Bangor City Council approved a measure Monday that prohibits people from smoking in vehicles when children are present.
When the law goes into effect next week, Bangor will become the first municipality in Maine to have such a law. Similar statewide measures have been adopted in Arkansas and Louisiana and are under consideration in several other states.
People who smoke with children present in the confined space of a car or truck might as well be deliberately trying to kill those children, said City Councilor Patricia Blanchette, who is a smoker.
"Let's step up to the plate and lead; our children are worth the fight," she said.
The ordinance, which was approved by a 6-3 vote, applies to any motor vehicles on any public roads within the city. Violators face fines of up to $50.
OBM: While I agree 100% with the intent of this law.....We must stop short of a law that controls a persons liberty with or within their own property. It's smoking now.... it will be something YOU DO NEXT!!!! LETS Recap: No smoking in - Government Buildings, Restaurants, Hospitals, some Hotels, more & more Jobs, Schools. Also you have to smoke far away OUTSIDE from these places....so many feet away from the door & now not in your own car....WOW!!! It must be up to the parents to protect their kids from smokers, and for kids of smokers....a media campaign by the government, cigarette companies, & the health industry to make it socially unacceptable would do the job.
An amendment that was added Monday to the original proposal makes the violation a primary offense, rather than a secondary offense. That means police can pull over vehicles if they see somebody smoking with anybody under 18 in the vehicle; if it were a secondary offense, police would have to stop the vehicle for some other reason, such as speeding.
Several residents, doctors and representatives from the Bangor Region Chamber of Commerce and the Fusion Bangor development group spoke in favor of the ordinance.
Pediatrician Robert Holmberg said the evidence is "incontrovertible" that exposure to cigarette smoke causes medical disorders in children, including asthma, bronchitis, ear infections and heart disease.
"Children are the most in need of the protection by public policy, because they can't protect themselves," he said.
But the ordinance also had its critics.
Councilor Susan Hawes, who voted against the law, said the police department should devote its energy to more important issues. There's already too much government intervention in people's lives, she said.
Aaron Prill of Bangor told the council that the ordinance was a "feel- good option" that was not intended to protect children but rather to "moralize" against smokers. Most smokers have enough common sense not to smoke around children, he said.
Tuesday, January 09, 2007
Monday, January 08, 2007
Employees Find Noose Hanging at Work
By Allan Chernoff
CNN
NEW YORK (CNN) -- James Jackson, a 26-year-old black employee of 180 Connect, was preparing for another day of installing cable, telephone and Internet service to residential customers of Cablevision in Nassau County, New York on December 7.
When he walked to the fenced-off area to pick up equipment for the day's jobs he looked up and was shocked to see a vicious, racist symbol in his workplace. A noose was hanging in the fenced-off equipment area, visible to the dozens of installers, the majority of whom are black, but accessible only to his boss and an equipment manager, both of whom are white.
Jackson, a former messenger who had worked at 180 Connect for a year and a half, immediately confronted the equipment manager, Dave Willie.
"I asked Dave," Jackson told CNN, " 'What is that hanging up there?' and he said, 'That is a noose' and I said, 'I know it's a noose, but why is it up there?' And he walked away."
Jackson and his co-workers say they were distraught.
"I just wanted to leave. I wanted to get out of there," 180 Connect employee Ralph Satterwhite told CNN. "I was disgusted."
The installers say they never complained to Human Resources. Instead, they consulted with a labor attorney, documented the incident, and decided to file a complaint with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
Installer Shomari Houston, according to the complaint, says he asked his white boss, Gary Murdock, why a hangman's noose was in his workplace. He says the response was: To hang two black employees.
"He said, 'Yo, I like that, it's cool, I am gonna hang Russell up there. Think we can get James up there?' " Houston recalls Murdock saying. "I looked at him like, 'You serious.' "
Jackson says he continued to ask that the noose be taken down, and openly recorded the following conversation with Willie.
Jackson: "Who's that for, the rope?"
Willie: "For anybody who goes past that door that I don't want them in there."
Wednesday, January 03, 2007
What Really Happened at Danziger Bridge in New Orleans on September 4
Something Doesn't Add Up:
1. This story has seven cops arrested for shooting two black looters.
2. The only footage/images of the officers only include them being surounded by supporters.
3. Every...and I mean....EVERY!!! news report focuses on these cops being heros and not the details with this case.
4. A Mystery Helicopter
A civilian helicopter crashed next to the Danziger Bridge. That chopper was a Puma-321, a military type.
5. A Judge Is Jailing Seven Cops?
6. Too Many Story Versions
Ver 1: ---- Police had a confrontation with some mysterious security contractors, and shot five.
Ver 2---- Mystery gunman shot Army Corps of Engineers, and police killed the gunmen
Ver 3---Five looters shot at cops, so the cops killed them
Ver 4---Police shoot two looters
Here's the full text of the Associated Press article on something that happened at Danziger Bridge in New Orleans on September 4:
"Police shot and killed at least five people Sunday after gunmen opened fire on a group of contractors traveling across a bridge on their way to make repairs, authorities said.
Deputy Police Chief W.J. Riley said police shot at eight people carrying guns, killing five or six.
Fourteen contractors were traveling across the Danziger Bridge under police escort when they came under fire, said John Hall, a spokesman for the Army Corps of Engineers.
They were on their way to launch barges into Lake Pontchartrain to help plug the breech in the 17th Street Canal, Hall said.
None of the contractors was injured, Mike Rogers, a disaster relief coordinator with the Army Corps of Engineers, told reporters in Baton Rouge.
The bridge spans a canal connecting Lake Pontchartrain and the Mississippi River.
No other details were immediately available."
This is a revision of the first version:
"Police shot eight people carrying guns on a New Orleans bridge Sunday, killing five or six, a deputy chief said. A spokesman for the Army Corps of Engineers said the victims were contractors on their way to repair a canal.
The contractors were walking across a bridge on their way to launch barges into Lake Pontchartrain to fix the 17th Street Canal, said John Hall, a spokesman for the Corps.
Earlier Sunday, New Orleans Deputy Police Chief W.J. Riley said police shot at eight people, killing five or six.
The shootings took place on the Danziger Bridge, which spans a canal connecting Lake Pontchartrain and the Mississippi River.
No other details were immediately available."
The Associated Press had severe second thoughts about the first version:
"Stations: The latest New Orleans-datelined urgent series Hurricane Katrina-Shootings has been KILLED. The Army Corps of Engineers says the contractors were shot at, then police fatally shot the gunmen who'd fired on the contractors. The contractors were NOT killed.
A kill is mandatory. Make certain the story is not broadcast.A sub will be filed shortly.AP Broadcast News Center - Washington"
The difference between the two AP stories is that one story has the police shooting and killing armed contractors, while the later story has them shooting and killing people who were shooting on armed contractors. A fairly significant change.
Reuters has what appears to be an even later version (or here) of the story:
"New Orleans police killed four looters who had opened fire on them on Sunday as rescue teams scoured homes and toxic waters flooding streets to find survivors and recover thousands of bloated corpses.
A fifth looter was in critical condition but no more details were available about the incident in a city where authorities are slowly regaining control after a wave of looting, murders and rapes in the wake of Hurricane Katrina.
'Five men who were looting exchanged gunfire with police. The officers engaged the looters when they were fired upon,' said New Orleans superintendent of police, Steven Nichols.
U.S. Army Corps of Engineers contractors working on a levee breach were fired on by gunmen but no one was hurt, said the Corps' Mike Rogers. It was not clear if the two incidents were connected."
So now it appears there were two incidents, one where U.S. Army Corps of Engineers contractors were fired upon but no one was hurt, and one with no contractors, where police killed looters who were firing at them. The incident appears to have been reported on Australian television, together with the sound of live gunfire.
Quite the story. It made a considerable impression on various right-wing bloggers, who felt it showed how these dangerous black looters were so evil that they were preventing repair of the levees in order to keep the city flooded so they could continue looting.
When you think about it, that theory seems to give the looters a degree of planning and organization which is not credible. It makes more sense that the police would get into a gunfight with looters, or even use the excuse of looters to explain why they killed a lot of people, but how then did the AP get the whole story so wrong - twice! - by adding the contractors to the mix?
Mystery Helicopter:
It was a big day at Danziger Bridge. Later in the day a helicopter crashed there. From USA Today (or here):
". . . in the evening, a civilian helicopter crashed near the Danziger Bridge, but the two people on board escaped with only cuts and scrapes, according to Mark Smith of the state office of emergency preparedness."
More, from CNN (more CNN here):
"On Sunday, a helicopter that had been involved in rescue operations crashed northwest of New Orleans.
No evacuees were on board the Eurocopter AS 332 Super Puma and the pilot and crew were rescued safely, according to an official with Helinet Aviation Services, which had a chopper flying above the crash site."
More, again from the AP:
"A civilian helicopter that was not involved in rescue operations crashed in New Orleans on Sunday and the two people on board were slightly injured, a state official said.
The helicopter crashed in the area of the Danziger Bridge, said Mark Smith, spokesman for the Louisiana Office of Homeland Security and Emergency Preparedness.
'The helicopter came down hard and rolled over on its side and broke its blades off and broke its tail off,' Smith told reporters in Baton Rouge.
'There were two civilians on the helicopter. Both sustained cuts and scrapes,' he said.
It was not known why the helicopter was in the area, Smith said.
The US military and Coast Guard have conducted hundreds of helicopter flights in the New Orleans area in recent days searching for Hurricane Katrina survivors and have rescued thousands of storm victims.
Early media reports said the crashed aircraft was a Coast Guard helicopter.
Live television footage from the scene showed the red helicopter lying on the ground near a roadway, with smoke drifting from its cockpit. The ground around the wreck was blackened and churned up by the aircraft's rotor blades.
Smith said he did not know if shots had been fired at the helicopter. Gunfire has been reported on numerous occasion in the New Orleans area in recent days.
'It could have been mechanical failure,' he said."
So now a coast guard helicopter has morphed into a civilian helicopter, which is showing a peculiar fascination with the Danziger Bridge. This mysterious helicopter was also described as a 'rescue helicopter' and a 'Coast Guard Super Puma helicopter":
"A rescue helicopter has crashed in New Orleans, US television networks say.
The two crew members from the Coast Guard Super Puma helicopter were safe, MSNBC said.
Live television footage from the scene showed the red helicopter lying on the ground near a roadway, with smoke drifting from its cockpit. The ground around the wreck was blackened and churned up by the aircraft's rotor blades."
This is an awfully specific description to be wrong. On the other hand, the Coast Guard doesn't appear to use the Super Puma, but rather another Aerospatiale product called the Dolphin. Of course, the Coast Guard might have contracted with somebody with a Super Puma, so you never know. You have to wonder why a rescue helicopter was flying around the Danziger Bridge, not a residential area where there would be somebody in need of rescue, and on all accounts a dry enough area for quite a bit to be going on.
Some good questions:
1. "For certain, the Danzinger Bridge is nowhere near the breaches nor should the industrial area be a magnet for looters looking for television sets."
2. "The implication is that something is occuring on and near the Danziger Bridge which is both extraordinary and alarming.
3. A simple mind says the helicopter was a news aircraft gone out to follow up on the shooting and was forcefully not permitted to photograph.
4. A dull person could think that 3:00 pm in the afternoon is an odd hour to be on foot in the hot Gulf sun and rather late in the day to be getting around to starting repairs on breached levees.
5. A disinterested so-and-so might wonder about the police escort after having heard press accounts of the reduction of New Orleans police to skeleton crew on the point of exhaustion."
6. It has to be noted that it is an odd way to make repairs in a breech in the 17th Street Canal by launching barges into Lake Pontchartrain.
The best guess is that the police killed some people and used the Army contractor story to cover it up. The victims are unlikely to have been looters, but may have used guns in self-defense. The police story inadvertently disclosed that people working for the army were up to some mysterious job, a job that was supposed to be a secret. The helicopter went to take a look at what was going on, and was shot down. Discrepancies in the official story are starting to lead to theories that at least some levees and floodwalls were intentionally destroyed, theories that gain some credence in that even the experts are baffled at what happened to the floodwalls. Its a bit too convenient that storm surge gauges stopped functioning during a . . . storm surge, thus removing inconvenient questions about how a nine foot storm surge went over a wall designed to stop an 11.5 foot storm surge.
OBM.....People you must pay attention at all times!!!!!
We may never know What Really Happened!!!!!!
Tuesday, January 02, 2007
CNBC "Big Brother, Big Business" Recorded Nov 1, 2006
| What price are you paying for being well connected digitally in the post-information age? Who do you trust? | |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
